連邦控訴裁判所は 移民裁判官の事実上の判断に 屈しなければならない 亡命事件の最高裁判所の判決 Supreme Court rules federal appeals courts must defer to immigration judges' factual findings in asylum cases.

連邦控訴裁判所は 移民法の下の"実質的な証拠"基準を適用して 亡命事件における移民裁判官の事実上の判断に 従わなければならないと 合衆国最高裁判所は 満場一致で判決を下しました The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that federal appeals courts must defer to immigration judges' factual findings in asylum cases, applying the "substantial evidence" standard under the Immigration and Nationality Act. ケタンジ・ブラウン・ジャクソン判事が書いたこの判決は,相当な支持がない場合を除き,司法審査を制限し,裁判所に入国審査員の決定を擁護するよう求めて,入国管理局の権限を強化する. The decision, written by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, reinforces the executive branch's authority in immigration matters by limiting judicial review and requiring courts to uphold immigration judges' determinations unless they lack substantial support. この事件は,殺害の脅迫による迫害を主張したサルバドール人の家族を対象にしたが,亡命を拒否され,裁判所は,彼らの主張が迫害の法的基準を満たしていないことを確認した. The case involved a Salvadoran family who claimed persecution due to death threats but were denied asylum, with the Court affirming that their allegations did not meet the legal threshold for persecution. 判決は,亡命申請を簡素化し,遅延を軽減し,申請者が拒否を覆すのを困難にするようにすると予想され, 長期に渡って 行政上の屈辱を強める. The ruling is expected to streamline asylum appeals, reduce delays, and make it harder for applicants to overturn denials, reinforcing longstanding precedent on administrative deference.