パキスタンの最高裁判所は,紛争の多い憲法改正改正案を審査する上で,自らの公平性に疑問を投げかけた。 Pakistan's Supreme Court questioned its own impartiality in reviewing a controversial constitutional amendment altering judicial appointments and tenure.

2025年10月13日閲覧. ^ パキスタン最高裁判所は,第26条の憲法改正に係る課題を聴いた. On October 13, 2025, Pakistan’s Supreme Court heard challenges to the 26th Constitutional Amendment, which reformed judicial appointments, fixed the Chief Justice’s tenure at three years, and established a parliamentary committee to recommend the next CJP. 憲法改正法廷は 憲法改正法廷の構成を決定した修正案について 公正に裁くことができるかどうか疑問に思いつき 修正前裁判官の"全裁判所"の必要性について議論を巻き起こした. A constitutional bench questioned whether it could impartially rule on the amendment that shaped its own composition, sparking debate over the need for a "full court" of pre-amendment judges. 司法官は公正性について懸念を表明し, 請願人は修正案が司法の独立性を損なうと主張し, 適切な議会の承認なしに通過した. Justices raised concerns about impartiality, while petitioners argue the amendment undermines judicial independence and was passed without proper parliamentary approval. 裁判所は,まだ完全なベンチを形成することを決定していないため,審理は延期された. The court has not yet decided on forming a full bench, and the hearing was adjourned.